FANDOM

Type: Null and Silvally Are Not Legendary Pokemon

They are not Legendary Pokemon. Orange Lightspeed Ranger 17:48, December 19, 2016 (UTC) 

They are Legendary Pokémon

Type: Null and Silvally are legendary Pokémon because a data miner saw that they were it inside the game code and he posted a picture: https://goo.gl/U2FCxw Miguel616 (talk) 17:52, December 19, 2016 (UTC) 

That is the wrong data. You can get the game Sun & Moon. Orange Lightspeed Ranger 17:56, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

They are NOT Legendary because if they are Legendary, they would not evolve. Orange Lightspeed Ranger 18:36, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

And Cosmog, Cosmoem, Solgaleo and Lunala what? They are Legendary and they evolve.--Miguel616 (talk) 18:40, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Edits

Well, I am not certain if Type: Null and Silvally are Legendary Pokémon. For a start, that proof you have is unreliable. It comes from Facebook, which can be unreliable. Plus, if it is a list, where are Pokémon like Ho-Oh, Lugia, Deoxys etc. ? If anything, you'd need more proof to support that fact. Energy X 18:44, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Here you have the link to the list of Legendary Pokémon: https://twitter.com/SciresM/status/799324958770032641 And here the list of sublegendary Pokémon, where are Type: Null and Silvally: https://twitter.com/SciresM/status/799322666079551488 If you check his Twitter acount, you will see that he is an experimented programmer and I think it is true that both of them are Legendary Pokémon.--Miguel616 (talk) 18:56, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

It still isn't a reliable proof, though. Energy X 19:03, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Well, until The Pokémon Company says something about it, that is the most important and unic proof of that. From here it is your decision whether to believe it or not.--Miguel616 (talk) 19:09, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.