All posts by Gematarix

Welcome

I'm never intimidated by how large the scope of a topic is, like I made some Arceus TCG card articles recently.

I'm fine with it, even though I don't know SK85 well

You're welcome. The license difference is also a mechanism to protect against forking and help make clear distinction that it's the "unseen" earlier vision of what this wiki could've been like in the 2000s.

https://www.pokemonwiki.info/Main_Page

This is a reboot of wiki project from earlier this decade. It's a Pokemon Wiki but it uses a different content license (GFDL), so that means the content here cannot be forked into there (unless prior to June 19, 2009 with a legal disclaimer, but this wiki had virtually nothing at the time). The wiki's basically a hybrid of early WikiDex and Super Mario Wiki (both of which used to use GFDL before CC BY-SA).

Do keep in mind that this is NOT promoting a fork, which are basically the only offsite wikis prohibited by Fandom. It's just me informing of the existence of this side-project I'm doing just in case someone might misunderstand it as a conflict-of-interest. Besides, with Creative Commons as the industry standard, it's sadly not possible to do GFDL on Fandom (besides Zelda Wiki, but that's because it was bought out and was always GFDL). And also note that there can't be a content exchange between GFDL and CC BY-SA (unless it's solely from the original author, but I'll need more chatbot consultation on that).

Bye, sorry to see you have to leave. You did a great job as a discussions admin.

It's fine i'm preoccupied with tons of wiki stuff myself, so I haven't been full swing like last year.

Good job! I haven't played ZA yet, but i'm glad to see you're willing to help on the content

I only had issues with the learnsets

Ty for understanding

And then there's the Luigi Pikachu promotional TCG card

Yes for sure. i want to add more content to the pokemon species articles, esp SSB-related, though its kind of clogged up with outdated moveset and other templates at the moment..

Yeah i don't think so unless someone can spin it into being like "Trainer Cards" or whatever

Okay thats great to know, and makes sense. thank you for informing me

Looks amazing

I think "public domain" is better. because i don't think CC0 is like literally public domain in each & every instance. Feels more like some institutional term for public domain.

Keep out the Noncommercial stuff though

For what reason?

Im not opposed to navbox idea

Condensing that into a list template? what if theres like all these paragraphs?