(At least Super Mergist Wiki and Filb/WikiDex's contents have a chance of survival thanks to the very license their text/contents are released under; I'm mainly talking about Bulbapedia.)

Yw

I hope the wiki doesnt see the disclaimers as "poisoning" the article. It's just an accurate reflection of cc by-sa, and I'm certain it has everything for full transparency: title, source (site name), a link to the license, and history (including a local copy). Reflects my personality of discontentment at the stringent attribution requirements too, even if I understand why they exist. :P Over 350 articles on the Mario Wiki on Fandom already have an SMW disclaimer (accompanied by imported history).

I can think of cases where if NIWA wikis followed the rules, they'd have those, but they want to promote an "all original" image. the Donkey Kong coverage merged from dkwiki.com into mariowiki.com doesn't have the disclaimers like it should. Jiggywikki is lacking some of the Rare.fandom.com disclaimers that it needs because some of the text was from there.

Then again I believe i did see Wikipedia disclaimers on PokeWiki and WikiDex before. PokeWiki has one on their Nintendo DS article.

It actually enhances the wiki's credibility and transparency, if anything.

Looks neat and tidy, and precisely like what an academic paper would do when citing the origin of information.

Glad you like it. hopefully fandom does as well

I've locked Goh's Pinsir due to persistent editing to insert false information about its gender. In all honesty, I think it should've been done sooner, but I think because there haven't been any recent edits over its gender, none of us have thought to lock it XD

Thanks. I think indefinite is a bit harsh. I suggest a 1-week (or so) full protection and to ping both involved users on the Content Post to allow them to discuss the matter together.

@Kettlon Okay :)

PCG has now accused Gyo of aggressive and belligerence.

Message Wall:Paradox Cyborg Girl | Pokémon Wiki | Fandom