Forum:Paul the dragon trainer! - Discussion Mod user rights vote

This is a discussion, and vote about the user Paul the dragon trainer!, a former Discussions Moderator on this site. I have revoked his rights, believing that he quit the place (since he was inactive for three months), unaware there were other people, too. I could have contacted him on his talk page, but I believed like many users, he would not receive the notification in Discussions.

What does matter is the tone of how he wrote his demand to become a Discussions Moderator again. Here's the comment, where he actually outright explicitly states he would make alternative accounts to troll people, just to retain his user rights. In addition, he also insulted Professorshashank, the newest Discussion Moderator.

"This kiddo who you just promoted recently has shown no proficiency in moderating anything whatsoever. He could not even moderate a 2-member Fandom without pissing that other person off. I am referring to this pompous user named "Professorshashank". I have glanced through the moderating actions that was executed by him and it's just abhorrent."

"I can and will troll incessantly or will return with alts."

What do you think, should he receive his Discussion Moderator user rights back?

Vote
i want to see him back in users' right. He left because of exams, and now, he's back and i guess, forever on fandom. He's a good moderator as well. So, i'd go with support Sasake Haise (talk) 10:52, February 24, 2018 (UTC)

Even though the tone is questionable, the content itself is pretty reasonable and well thought-out. The less-than-polite tone may be attributed to the shock of being demoted so abruptly, as mentioned by yourself Energy. Looking at his post in its entirety, instead of snippets and quotes, only reason he was so hysterical was the state he found Discussions in. Let not the tone take away the substance of his post. Taken on its merit, it is fair criticism of the promotion criteria at the time and off-topic. Hence I am voting Suppor/Neutral. Gary Oakkk 11:02, February 24, 2018 (UTC)

I would have readily agreed, but the hostile behaviour of this user towards the new moderator and his insult stuns me, and I am not sure about him. I am not opposing him, as I know nothing about his actions previously, possibly he was a good moderator. Due to his current behaviour, I am unsure, so I will remain neutral.Shashank Singh 11:23, February 24, 2018 (UTC)professorshashank

I do not know how many times I must repeat this, but my rationale for making a post and not make a talk page comment has already been explained by me in the comment thread. And I did not "insult" without any valid reasoning. Just look at his parting comment before he locked my post, filled with "I cannot believe you would say that" sort of commentary, and playing the "helpless maiden in distress" card, along with his usual overbearing choice of words, which is all on bigger display even in his previous posts as well. Isn't this in line with what I said about not having the right attitude for a mod? Anyway, this vote for my rights, to me, is not the most important thing in my heart. I would rather have the off-topic vote be done sooner. Hence I hope after this vote is over, whatever the outcome, the off-topic itself (or vote) can be implemented without delay.